E-LAB-12 · BENCHMARK RESULTS

Validation & Results

Empirical validation across configurations · Comparative stability analysis

Performance Benchmarks

Five-Configuration Comparative Analysis

FULL ENTRO-DASA (v10.2)

🟢 CONSISTENCY LOCK

CCS_sys0.97

False Divergence Rate0.03

CERI94%

σ=0.30 CCS0.89

No Adaptive Gravity

🟠 DEGRADED

CCS_sys0.83

False Divergence Rate0.17

CERI76%

σ=0.30 CCS0.61

No Consistency Lock

🟠 PARTIAL

CCS_sys0.91

False Divergence Rate0.09

CERI87%

σ=0.30 CCS0.74

No Sync Force

🟠 PARTIAL

CCS_sys0.87

False Divergence Rate0.13

CERI81%

σ=0.30 CCS0.68

Ungoverned Baseline

🔴 FAILED

CCS_sys0.29

False Divergence Rate0.63

CERI12%

σ=0.30 CCS0.14

Entropy Suppression

Cognitive Entropy Reduction by Noise Regime

Noise Regime	σ	CERI	CCS	Status
Low Noise	0.05	97%	0.99	🟢 EXCELLENT
Moderate Noise	0.15	94%	0.97	🟢 GOOD
High Noise	0.30	89%	0.89	🟡 ACCEPTABLE
Critical Threshold	0.38	80%	0.80	🟠 THRESHOLD

Phase Transition

Critical Noise Threshold Characterization

σ Range	Phase	Description
σ ≤ 0.30	🟢 CONSISTENCY LOCK	Certified attractor confinement
0.30 < σ ≤ 0.40	🟠 MONITORING PHASE	Preventive gravity adjustment
σ > 0.40	🔴 CRITICAL DEVIATION	Immediate recapture required